Savarkar – A Novel Perspective
 
 
 
Preface by Dr. Abhiram Dixit for the Marathi Book
“Savarkar – A Novel Perspective”

1. At Vasai in North Maharashtra, Jyostna Tandel a twenty-year-old girl was thrown into fire. It was believed that evil spirits had possessed her. The young girl died on 1st February 2006. A bit earlier on 10th May 2005, a mob burnt fifteen houses of dalits at a place near Kolhapur in South Maharashtra. The poor lost their homes in the caste riots. We do feel that our society, gripped as it is by superstition and castism, so, needs a forward looking and rational approach to our common problems. Hence the present publication.

2. Humanism is at the very core of Sawarkar's thought. Of course, Veer Sawarkar fought against the British rule. With guns and bombs, he took on the might of the British Empire. Fearless volunteers from his secret society 'Abhinav Bharat' ventured to England to kill tyrannical British Officers. Nevertheless, Sawarkar had no hatred against the English. He says at one place, "We have never hated the English people. Nor encouraged others do so. As long as they remain aggressors in India and continue to oppress us, they remain our enemies. Once they cease to be aggressors, they become our friends. We share a common humanity and stand together for the brotherhood of man. We would even fight on the side of England if the liberty of England were in danger of being usurped*.

*Samagra Savarkar Vaangmay (Marathi),2001- pg 1:172

Further on, in the same article, there is the lodestar of
his thoughts "Our true caste is Man, true religion humanity and true motherland, the Earth.”


3. The British rule was unjust and tyrannical. It rested on the force of arms. Therefore, Sawarkar retaliated by using arms thus opposing utmost power by adverse power. A nation that has lost its freedom is ceaselessly at war. The revolutionaries did not have artillery. Therefore, they made do with small arms. In the circumstances, Sawarkar found limited violence to be inevitable and justified its use. This was not because he was in love with violence. While delineating the inevitability of use of force he says, "It is necessary to use force to draw out the fangs and nails of cruel animals.”

Top / Next